Keywords: e-invoicing, electronic invoicing, einvoicing, purchase to pay, business case
Blog Post | 9 July 2012
Author: Sarah Feurey
Scott Turkington of Scottish Water was one of our speakers at Toning Up Purchase to Pay to Attain Touchless Processing. His story was an interesting one. Because his team only processes about 100,000 invoices per annum (seemingly low volumes for an e-invoicing programme), he initially didn’t consider e-invoicing as a solution. However, two years ago, he was introduced to an e-invoicing network at a sharedserviceslink.com conference and started thinking differently: e-invoicing could be an option after all.
As a utility, Scottish Water’s business goals were to:
Ensure continuity of service
Improve customer service
Protect the business from financial shocks (i.e. costs during droughts)
To see if e-invoicing could help him achieve these goals, Scott developed a detailed analysis. He recognised the benefits of a fixed-cost network fee, a lower volume of manual invoicing, and a reduced risk of service failure.
So it looked like there was a business case on his side (the buyer side) regardless of the relatively low volumes. The unanswered question however was, was there a business case on the supplier side?
To address this, Scott sent out a survey to 60 key suppliers asking “What is your company’s cost of printing, sending and tracking a paper invoice to your Scottish Water?”
The results were insightful:
| Less than £1 | 26% |
| £1 – £2 | 52% |
| £2 - £3 | 16% |
| More than £3 | 6% |
This meant that 68% of suppliers spent between £1 and £3 to send a paper invoice.
This helped Scottish Water to realise that even if the supplier was charged an acceptable fee for e-invoicing, a business case existed on the supplier side.
Scottish Water went ahead, using OB10 as their e-invoicing provider. According to Scott, here are the results:
Productivity increased of 30% year on year
PO compliance increased to 99%
Payment on time reaching 96%
Invoices processed electronically reaching 42% (aiming for 60% next year)
These are impressive results. Scott’s secrets for securing the above include:
Engage early with your suppliers, buyers, IT, and procurement department. Anyone who has direct contact with suppliers should be able to reinforce the fact that this is coming. They should be well versed in the benefits of enrolling.
Secure strong internal project management and ensure people understand drivers and goals of your project.
Bring in suppliers to discuss the business case and understand the risks. Scottish Water was very open and shared their business case with service providers to make them prove they could deliver value and reduce risks.
Tailor your supplier communications - they are not ‘one size fits all’. Sit down face to face with your top 5 suppliers and let them know e-invoicing is coming and explain the process and benefits. Communication methods included: webinars, supplier relationship meetings, phone calls letters and emails.
Motivate your AP team. Scottish Water had a team who were process- focused, cared about development plans, drove compliance, understood the process and made it work. These are not easy tasks, and it is essential to keep the team motivated through this challenging time.
So to summarise, can you make e-invoicing work financially with low volumes? Scottish Water has.
What about you? Do you have a similar story?
Webinar 22.05.2013 Register
Webinar 30.05.2013 Register
Webinar 05.06.2013 Register
Blog post16.05.2013
Blog post15.05.2013
Blog post13.05.2013
Blog post08.05.2013
Blog post07.05.2013
White paper & report10.05.2013
White paper & report09.05.2013
White paper & report07.05.2013
White paper & report03.05.2013
Webinar30.04.2013
Webinar27.03.2013
Webinar26.03.2013
By submitting this form you will become a sharedserviceslink.com member. Members receive our weekly newsletter, and communications about sharedserviceslink.com products and services. See the full membership benefits here.
We will never sell your details to any third parties. View our privacy policy for more information.
Comments in chronological order
There are no comments.
You need to be logged in to leave a comment