Keywords: outsourcing, business process outsourcing, Horses for Sources, BPO, outsourcing survey, outsourcing benefits, Phil Fersht
Blog Post | 10 September 2012
Author: Anna Bowsher
A few weeks ago, I wrote a blog on Horses for Sources’ controversial survey asking whether the word ‘outsourcing’ should be dropped for good. Last week it was revealed that a huge 61% of industry stakeholders were in favour of a vocabulary shake-up.
There were 871 respondents in total, made up of 151 buyers, 418 providers and 302 advisors of outsourcing services. Half of the enterprise buyers who responded had over $5bn in revenue, 73% are “significant influencers”, and a majority had many years of experience with outsourcing.
That nearly two-thirds of these professionals are fed up of the term is incredibly revealing. With rapid developments in the technological market and the greater availability of skilled, low-cost labour in alternative locations, BPO providers have never had more of an opportune time to expand their business.
But how can we re-brand the industry to shake off negative connotations such as onshore redundancy and loss of departmental control, and re-shift the focus towards the substantial benefits that outsourcing can bring to a business?
A key problem with using one word to cover a variety of projects is that it is generic and misleading. As one commenter on the results noted, “Outsourcing describes an inconsistent set of services”. Partnering with an outsourcing provider, however, can allows businesses to take advantage of specialist knowledge and cost savings in one area (usually back office functions), whilst focussing a majority of their efforts on what they’re actually good at.
Phil Fersht, founder of Horses for Sources, said, “Today’s business leaders must be able to associate ‘outsourcing’ with business value creation and true value partnerships with service providers which are instituting new capabilities into their businesses”.
But it’s not just about the jargon. The report highlighted four key challenges facing the outsourcing industry that must be addressed before perceptions can be changed:
We’d love to hear how you have practically tackled these issues in your organisation– get in touch to share your opinions and stories.
Webinar 18.06.2013 Register
Webinar 27.06.2013 Register
Webinar 02.07.2013 Register
Blog post17.06.2013
Blog post03.06.2013
Blog post20.03.2013
Blog post13.02.2013
Blog post19.11.2012
White paper & report18.04.2013
White paper & report15.02.2013
White paper & report10.08.2012
Presentation28.02.2012
Presentation27.02.2012
Webinar22.02.2012
Presentation20.02.2012
Presentation13.02.2012
By submitting this form you will become a sharedserviceslink.com member. Members receive our weekly newsletter, and communications about sharedserviceslink.com products and services. See the full membership benefits here.
We will never sell your details to any third parties. View our privacy policy for more information.
Comments in chronological order (1 comment)
You need to be logged in to leave a comment
Matthew Heffron, Sourcing Sage | 17 September 2012
I wrote an article on the subject as well, inciting those in our industry to accept a wider definition of what it is we do: http://www.sourcingsage.com/blog/2012/8/23/stop-calling-it-outsourcing.html